NSW ports → site · Cross-border volumetric supply (illustrative boundary)
Imported volumetric modules to NSW (boundary case)
Not a project to cheerlead. A working object for Australia’s import-versus-localise question, including certification friction.
- Dwellings
- Unknown / insufficient evidence
- GFA
- Unknown / insufficient evidence
- Value
- Unknown / insufficient evidence
- Duration planned / actual
- — / —
Evidence confidence · 22%
MMC Intensity
84 / 100
Evidence confidence · 22%
High intensity if delivered. Intensity does not answer the entropy question.
Not a sustainability rating. High intensity can still fail coherence.
Coherence Score
Unknown / insufficient evidence
The governing question for this object: does importing modules improve whole-system coherence, or move energy, risk and labour offshore? No score until a real shipment, a real site, and a real boundary are evidenced.
- Embodied energy · Unknown · unknown
- Transport / logistics · Unknown · unknown
- Construction time · Unknown · unknown
Building anatomy
Factory → transport → site → operation, where known.
- structure
- Offshore volumetric — hypothetical pathway
- bathrooms
- In-module
Timeline
Planned versus actual, when both exist.
Announcement
—
Design
—
Approval
—
Contract
—
Manufacture
—
Shipping
—
Installation
—
Completion
—
Occupancy
—
Supply chain
- Manufacturer · CIMC Modular Building Systems
- Factory · CIMC Jiangmen modular plant
- System · 3D volumetric
Performance
- embodiedEnergy
- Unknown — factory + sea freight + site must be in the same boundary